PDA

View Full Version : OC Report :: Buffalo FireStix 2x1GB PC2-9600 C5


3oh6
07-17-2007, 04:51 PM
http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs8000c5/buffalo_logo.gif

The FireStix are back for round two and this time they came packing heat. Buffalo Technology has developed a fairly well known brand with their FireStix line of memory and really gotten their foot in the door with the enthusiast. They were known as one of the better values throughout enthusiast forums while DDR2 prices were still fairly high offering D9GMH/D9GKX at a better price than most other manufacturers. Now that DDR2 prices have dipped, the value the FireStix line offered isn't as big but they are still some of the better priced modules out there.

http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs8000c5/firestix_logo-1.png

As always, I provide full disclosure with any info I post and this report is no different. I received these modules directly from Buffalo Technology as a review sample but I was assured that they were your average retail sample sent from the same place they would have been sent from had I ordered them myself. Here are the basic specifications of these modules:

* Part #FSX1200D2D-K2G
* 2GB kit (2 x 1024MB)
* DDR2-1200 5-6-6 @ 2.3v
* 2x 240-pin DDR2 DIMMs
* Non-ECC, Unbuffered
* Aluminum heat spreader with thermally-conductive adhesive
* Lifetime Warranty

These are fairly new modules but I was still able to find them at NCIX up here in Canada. At the time of writing this, they were listed for $375 CND (http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=24681&vpn=FSX1200D2D-K2G&manufacture=Buffalo). Of course, you can also purchase these modules directly from Buffalo at an extremely decent price of $289 USD (http://www.shopatbuffalotech.com/cart/product.php?productid=16531&cat=0&page=1). Hopefully NCIX just has them listed for a higher price until they come in stock. I hate how NCIX gouges certain items because they are the only supplier in Canada but what can you do? Either way, let's have a quick look at the package and the modules themselves.


Package:
Click for full size...
http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/package-1.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/package-1.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/package-2.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/package-2.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/package-3.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/package-3.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/package-4.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/package-4.jpg)

Buffalo appears to have made a slight revision to the blister pack that they ship their modules in. You'll notice in the images above that the outside rim of the entire package is heat-stamped and sealed. On top of this, the back also has a couple of grooves molded in that really gives the package a lot of rigidity.

I don't really think the typical blister pack needed these enhancements for regular sized modules but this package certainly is the most secure I have seen memory come in. The only downside is the fact that it is impossible to open without a weapon and the package gets chewed up pretty good in the process.


Modules:
Click for full size...
http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/contents-1.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/contents-1.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/contents-2.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/contents-2.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/contents-3.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/contents-3.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/contents-4.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/contents-4.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/contents-5.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/contents-5.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/contents-6.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/contents-6.jpg)

If you saw my last OC Report of the PC2-8000 FireStix (http://www.ocxtreme.org/forumenus/showthread.php?p=1149#post1149), you will notice that there have been no changes to the FireStix heatspreaders since then. These DDR1200 sticks come with a standard aluminum heatspreader secured with your run of the mill thermal tape. Popping the heatspreaders off these modules is fairly easy but you still have to take great care in doing so. As expected, Micron D9GKX are the ICs used on these modules. The PCB appears to still be made by Dynamic with the part #2D286NF-BA. Unfortunately, I cannot find any more info on this PCB so it is tough to say whether it is still a 6-layer design of if they have made the jump to an 8-layer PCB like many other manufacturers have with high-end modules.


P5B-Dlx Setup:
Click for full size...
http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/setup-1.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/setup-1.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/setup-2.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/setup-2.jpg) http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/small/setup-3.jpg (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/setup-3.jpg)

I will be utilizing my trusty P5B-Dlx setup for testing and if I get lucky, I will have my hands on an IP-35 Pro for long enough to do testing on P35 while I have this kit. As you can see, I always use active cooling on the memory regardless of voltage being run and the testing will only go up to 2.45v on the P5B-Dlx as I haven't volt modded the vDIMM on this board. Here is the complete list of hardware used:
Intel 965P Setup:
MB: Asus P5B-Dlx Wifi Rev 1.03G BIOS-0804 (vcore / vmch mods)
CPU: Intel C2D E6600 (L629B383)
CPU Cooling: Thermalright Ultra-120
GPU: Biostar 7600GS 256MB DDR3
NB Cooling: Zalman ZM-NB47J
PSU: Silverstone Zeus 560W
HD: Seagate SATAII 80GB 8MB NCQ
FANS: Adda AD1212MS-A73GL (80CFM @ 2000RPM)
OS: Windows 2K3 Server

Ambient Temperature: 22-23C
My standard disclaimer before we see the numbers:
First, the voltage listed in each screenshot is measured with a digital multi-meter from the vDIMM output coil. My board tends to over-volt slightly at the various voltage settings.

Second, I am only interested in dual 32M SPi stability for my overclocking reports. I have found dual 32M stable with tight secondaries usually means Prime / Win Memtest stable within a few MHz at the same voltage. Don't confuse dual 32M stable with 24/7 stable but it is pretty close most of the time.

Third, and most important, these results are from one kit clocked on one motherboard. Your results are certainly going to be different because no single kit of memory is the same and every motherboard handles memory differently. Again, better or worse, results will vary from user to user and kit to kit.


P5B-Dlx Results:
http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/965p_results-1.png
3-3-3-x:
Intel P965x:
Click link for full size screenshot including Memset...
375MHz :: 2.02v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/333x-1.png) | 392MHz :: 2.12v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/333x-2.png) | 421MHz :: 2.26v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/333x-3.png) | 437MHz :: 2.37v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/333x-4.png) | 446MHz :: 2.47v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/333x-5.png)
It appears that my slump of getting dog sticks at anything but 5-5-5 has been broken. These PC2-9600 FireStix were quite impressive at 3-3-3 timings. Sub-timings are reasonably tight throughout the frequency scale as well making this one impressive kit. I did try running 3-4-3 timings after 3-3-3 and gained next to nothing at the few voltages stops that I tried. This had me concerned that 4-4-4 was not going to run well.


4-4-4-x:
Intel P965x:
Click link for full size screenshot including Memset...
481MHz :: 2.02v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/444x-1.png) | 502MHz :: 2.12v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/444x-2.png) | 537MHz :: 2.26v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/444x-3.png) | 555MHz :: 2.37v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/444x-4.png) | 574MHz :: 2.47v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/444x-5.png)
4-4-4 timings started out relatively impressive at low voltage. They also scaled with voltage pretty well but nothing too impressive. Keep in mind, my standards are fairly high and I am still looking for that elusive 4-4-4 600Mhz @ 2.45v or less kit of memory for benching. being dual 32M stable means that at 2.6v, possibly even 2.55v, this kit should be single 32M stable at 4-4-4 600MHz which is mighty nice to be truthfully honest. i just don't like running that high voltage, even for benching.


5-5-5-x:
Intel P965x:
Click link for full size screenshot including Memset...
586MHz :: 2.02v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/555x-1.png) | 607MHz :: 2.12v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/555x-2.png) | 645MHz :: 2.26v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/555x-3.png) | 651MHz :: 2.37v (http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/555x-4.png)
This is where the PC2-9600 FireStix really light it up. At a paultry 2.12v, this kit spit out dual 32M Spi at 600MHz with ease. Sub-timings at 600MHz are even quite impressive. Naturally the sub-timings have to loosen up past 600MHz but remained fairly tight. Topping out at 650MHz is not the limit of these sticks rather my motherboard. I have seen it before and will see it again. I really want to get these sticks on a P35 chipset board that handles memory as well because they would absolutely scream.


P5B-Dlx Bandwidth:
My OC Reports are quickly evolving into full fledged enthusiast reviews it seems. I have had some requests for bandwidth numbers to accompany the overclocking results in the past so I will be adding these results to my OC Reports starting with these PC2-9600 Buffalo FireStix. I wasn't sure exactly how to tackle this Bandwidth section so please make any suggestions you wish as to how I can arrange results better or what results should be added.

http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/965p_bandwidth-1.png http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/965p_bandwidth-2.png http://3oh6.com/forum_posted/ocx/fs9600c5/965p_bandwidth-3.png

I tried to keep the CPU frequency under 3600MHz by adjusting the CPU multiplier and using different dividers to provide similar results to the majority of users on air cooling are going to see. All of the bandwidth numbers were obtained on the 1066 strap (boot @ 400FSB or less) to keep the results as comparable as possible.

As from the results, it is evident that either the 2:3 strap reduces Write bandwidth or the tighter timings are simply superior for Write bandwidth because the 3-3-3 results really stand out with higher Write bandwidth.


Conclusion:
That about finishes up what I had planned for this kit and this OC Report. I hope you find it helpful in your search for DDR2 memory. Again, keep in mind, these results are all from a single kit of memory and like everything else in overclocking...nothing is guaranteed so don't assume that every single kit of this memory will perform the same. If your lucky, your kit will be better than mine :ocx43:

erwinz
07-17-2007, 08:58 PM
very nice review.. :) thanks for sharing.. :D

hausner
07-17-2007, 11:16 PM
fantastic review, great pictures,results!

Stapler
07-17-2007, 11:23 PM
Nice review, but it's really do bad they don't do 4-4-4-x at 600mhz.

3oh6
07-17-2007, 11:58 PM
thanx guys...this is definitely one of the better kits i have gotten lately for all timing sets of 3-3-3, 4-4-4, and 5-5-5.
Nice review, but it's really do bad they don't do 4-4-4-x at 600mhz.
yeah, 4-4-4 600MHz would have been nice but to be honest, all of the PC2-9200 and PC2-9600 kits i have gotten in the last few months have been absolute dogs at 4-4-4. these buffalo sticks are almost as good as my Super Talent PC2-8000 C4s and Team PC2-6400 C3s at 4-4-4...not quite as good but decent and those other two kits are from way back when good clocking 4-4-4 D9GMH/D9GKX was fairly abundant.

Stapler
07-18-2007, 12:02 AM
Yeah all the new kits are only good for 5-5-5-x. Still, with P35, 5-5-5-x isn't so bad if you're significantly over 500fsb and you run 5:6.

Kain
07-18-2007, 01:48 AM
Very nice comparison 30h6.
Graphics made with which software may I ask?

Sam
07-18-2007, 01:56 AM
mind you - 575Mhz @ 4-4-4 @ 2.47V is not THAT bad ;)
that kit is just "above average"

nice and clear review, thanks :ocx44:

mickeymouse
07-18-2007, 09:46 AM
Its well balanced for sure ive seen so much newer d9 hate cas3 so this set can do it all cas3-5 well

:)

3oh6
07-18-2007, 10:03 AM
your quite welcome guys...as always, my pleasure.

@BT & MM...your right, 575Mhz @ 4-4-4 @ 2.47V is pretty damn decent to be honest. especially if you factor in the fact that all D9GMH/D9GKX that have been coming out lately hate anything but CL5. i was quite surprised when 3-3-3 started to scale as it did with voltage...completely caught me off guard. this kit will likely become my main benching kit alongside my Team 6400 C3s.